Change Array by copy
Provides additional methods on Array.prototype
and TypedArray.prototype
to enable changes on the array by returning a new copy of it with the change.
Status
This proposal is currently at Stage 2.
Champions
- Robin Ricard (Bloomberg)
- Ashley Claymore (Bloomberg)
Overview
This proposal introduces the following function properties to Array.prototype
:
Array.prototype.withReversed() -> Array
Array.prototype.withSorted(compareFn) -> Array
Array.prototype.withSpliced(start, deleteCount, ...items) -> Array
Array.prototype.withAt(index, value) -> Array
All of those methods keep the target Array untouched and returns a copy of it with the change performed instead.
They will also be added to TypedArrays:
TypedArray.prototype.withReversed() -> TypedArray
TypedArray.prototype.withSorted(compareFn) -> TypedArray
TypedArray.prototype.withSpliced(start, deleteCount, ...items) -> TypedArray
TypedArray.prototype.withAt(index, value) -> TypedArray
These methods will then be avaliable on subclasses of TypedArray
. i.e. the following:
Int8Array
Uint8Array
Uint8ClampedArray
Int16Array
Uint16Array
Int32Array
Uint32Array
Float32Array
Float64Array
BigInt64Array
BigUint64Array
Example
const sequence = [1, 2, 3];
sequence.withReversed(); // => [3, 2, 1]
sequence; // => [1, 2, 3]
const outOfOrder = new Uint8Array([3, 1, 2]);
outOfOrder.withSorted(); // => Uint8Array [1, 2, 3]
outOfOrder; // => Uint8Array [3, 1, 2]
const correctionNeeded = [1, 1, 3];
correctionNeeded.withAt(1, 2); // => [1, 2, 3]
correctionNeeded; // => [1, 1, 3]
Motivation
The Tuple.prototype
introduces these functions as a way to deal with the immutable aspect of the Tuples in Record & Tuple. While Arrays are not immutable by nature, this style of programming can be beneficial to users dealing with frozen arrays for instance.
This proposal notably makes it easier to write code able to deal with Arrays and Tuples interchangeably.
Relationship with Record & Tuple
While this proposal is derived from Record & Tuple, it should progress independently.
If web compatibility prescribes it, property names defined in this proposal are going to be changed. Those changes should be reflected on Tuple.prototype
.